FN cuatro. Brand new Panel helps make no contention within this desire you to management mandate isnt the right answer neither the independent judgment shot try inapplicable. I do mention, but not, that a couple requirements out of remark wherein an attempt court critiques an administrative agency’s conclusions, the new reasonable proof test and this new independent judgment test, question only the report about truthful conclusions. (Strumsky v. San diego County Professionals Old age Assn. (1974) 11 Cal. three-dimensional 28, 44-forty five [112 Cal. 805, 520 P.2d 29].) Brand new scope regarding feedback does not apply to post on management determinations that aren’t truthful results. (Zink v. Town of Sausalito (1977) 70 Cal. Application. 3d 662, 665 [139 Cal. 59].) Where, given that right here, the important points are not in conflict, it is unimportant on the influence perhaps the nice research otherwise the fresh separate view shot enforce.
FN 5. The term “residence” is a phrase no specific meaning, essentially requiring design concerning the statute otherwise objective in which its employed. (Get in re Morelli (1970) eleven Cal. App. three-dimensional 819, 830 [91 Cal. 72].) Its apparently reported to be synonymous with “domicile.” (Look for Elec. Code, two hundred, subd. (a);Burt v. Scarborough (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 817, 820 [17 Cal. 146, 366 P.2d 498] (construing “residence” to have location objectives).) In the event that word “residence” is actually certified because of the including words once the “actual” otherwise “bona-fide,” its included in an atmosphere which may preclude one away from starting multiple home, and the home should be the dominant host to quarters. (Understand the bodies discussed supra, and you can seeBurt v. 2d during the p. 820.)